![]() Levine and Molina’s curtain-raising theoretical overview is useful and much needed. A brief review lends itself best to consideration of the general questions rather than the specific findings for each country.ĭiego Abente-Brun is deputy director of the International Forum for Democratic Studies at the National Endowment for Democracy. Each chapter addresses the guiding questions posed by the editors, making the book a truly coherent comparative exercise. In between are case-study chapters on Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. To this they add a final chapter that attempts to draw some conclusions. The editors open with a pair of chapters that ask in detail what the quality of democracy is and how it can be gauged. The fruits of the effort are set forth in the present volume, which may safely be called an indispensable tool for all those interested in democracy’s fate, whether in Latin America or beyond. ![]() The group’s work focused on Latin America, but wider implications are not far to seek. ![]() In mid-decade, Daniel Levine and José Molina gathered a distinguished group with the aim of systematically improving upon the existing expert literature. What does it mean to speak of the “quality” of a country’s democracy, and how can this quality be measured and compared across cases? Since the early 2000s, a number of scholars have been trying to answer these questions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |